One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 197,973 recorded births

Violet

#13 in the US in 2025

Where Violet stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#13girls’ names · US 2025

Violet was the 13th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 7,546 births.

peak 2025 · 7,546188019532025

Its moment was 2025, when 7,546 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#13US rank, 2025 (girls)
7,546US births in 2025
#13its best US rank, in 2025
2025peak year — 7,546 births
185,561US births since 1880
5,241NZ births since 1900
7,171E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Violet's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Violet was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Violet in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0235469
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Violet in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 70% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Violet in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Violet has been registered 5,241 times since 1900, peaking in 1905 with 156 births. It ranked #28 for girls in 2025 on 92 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.08691738
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Violet in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Violet in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Violet was registered 7,171 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2025 with 1,061 births. It ranked #37 for girls in 2025 on 1,061 births.

20200.0209419
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Violet in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#23842
1890#176183
1900#108614
1910#891,037
1920#773,694
1930#1202,098
1940#217783
1950#343519
1960#541320
1970#920140
1980#1,023141
1990#1,279127
2000#734316
2010#1222,571
2020#375,128

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Violet most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California15,447
Pennsylvania11,279
Texas9,892
Illinois9,817
New York9,673
Ohio7,947
Michigan7,179
Minnesota5,424
Wisconsin5,395
Florida5,014

Questions about Violet

How popular is the name Violet?

Violet ranked #13 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 7,546 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Violet most popular?

Violet peaked in 2025, when 7,546 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Violet rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Violet has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+70%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2025, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.