One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 197,458 recorded births

Nora

#20 in the US in 2025

Where Nora stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#20girls’ names · US 2025

Nora was the 20th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 6,380 births.

peak 2025 · 6,380188019532025

Its moment was 2025, when 6,380 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#20US rank, 2025 (girls)
6,380US births in 2025
#20its best US rank, in 2025
2025peak year — 6,380 births
193,138US births since 1880
1,204NZ births since 1900
3,116E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Nora's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Nora was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Nora in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0271542
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Nora in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 26% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Nora in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Nora has been registered 1,204 times since 1900, peaking in 2025 with 54 births. It ranked #67 for girls in 2025 on 54 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0196392
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Nora in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Nora in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Nora was registered 3,116 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2025 with 616 births. It ranked #75 for girls in 2025 on 616 births. Across those years it has been rising.

20200.0122243
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Nora in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#55471
1890#63835
1900#83919
1910#111753
1920#1571,477
1930#1901,015
1940#209843
1950#2251,116
1960#2371,345
1970#365676
1980#400571
1990#431588
2000#500540
2010#1591,939
2020#305,583

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Nora most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Texas13,506
California11,879
New York11,276
Illinois8,750
Pennsylvania8,143
Ohio7,861
Michigan5,997
North Carolina5,909
Massachusetts4,864
Virginia4,774

Questions about Nora

How popular is the name Nora?

Nora ranked #20 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 6,380 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Nora most popular?

Nora peaked in 2025, when 6,380 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Nora rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Nora has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+26%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2025, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.