One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 109,951 recorded births

Iris

#61 in the US in 2025

Where Iris stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#61girls’ names · US 2025

Iris was the 61st most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 3,729 births.

peak 2025 · 3,729188019532025

Its moment was 2025, when 3,729 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#61US rank, 2025 (girls)
3,729US births in 2025
#61its best US rank, in 2025
2025peak year — 3,729 births
101,550US births since 1880
3,325NZ births since 1900
5,076E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Iris's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Iris was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Iris in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0116232
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Iris in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 135% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Iris in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Iris has been registered 3,325 times since 1900, peaking in 1916 with 119 births. It ranked #79 for girls in 2025 on 48 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0497994
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Iris in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Iris in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Iris was registered 5,076 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2022 with 762 births. It ranked #57 for girls in 2025 on 759 births. Across those years it has been rising.

20200.0150300
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Iris in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#51811
1890#59919
1900#42662
1910#319143
1920#262633
1930#203938
1940#221750
1950#239986
1960#338777
1970#371645
1980#428504
1990#417610
2000#413685
2010#3151,011
2020#1272,178

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Iris most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California11,124
New York10,215
Texas9,170
North Carolina4,352
Illinois4,125
Florida3,647
Pennsylvania3,273
Ohio3,140
Virginia3,072
Georgia2,958

Questions about Iris

How popular is the name Iris?

Iris ranked #61 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 3,729 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Iris most popular?

Iris peaked in 2025, when 3,729 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Iris rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Iris has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+135%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2025, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.