One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 771,737 recorded births

Rebecca

#349 in the US in 2025

Where Rebecca stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#349girls’ names · US 2025

Rebecca was the 349th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 872 births.

peak 1981 · 16,737188019532025

Its moment was 1981, when 16,737 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#349US rank, 2025 (girls)
872US births in 2025
#10its best US rank, in 1973
1981peak year — 16,737 births
755,992US births since 1880
12,408NZ births since 1900
1,223E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Rebecca's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Rebecca was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Rebecca in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.05171033
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Rebecca in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 39% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Rebecca in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Rebecca has been registered 12,408 times since 1900, peaking in 1978 with 514 births. It ranked #399 for girls in 2025 on 10 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.013782755
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Rebecca in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Rebecca in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Rebecca was registered 1,223 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 291 births. It ranked #413 for girls in 2025 on 98 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.052104
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Rebecca in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#92236
1890#107374
1900#125503
1910#154519
1920#1751,269
1930#1761,114
1940#962,555
1950#369,425
1960#389,970
1970#2910,854
1980#1715,281
1990#2113,677
2000#397,078
2010#1342,299
2020#2481,212

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Rebecca most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California65,869
Texas54,251
Ohio41,800
New York40,035
Pennsylvania38,531
Illinois33,163
Michigan29,309
North Carolina23,830
Florida23,752
Indiana23,028

Questions about Rebecca

How popular is the name Rebecca?

Rebecca ranked #349 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 872 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Rebecca most popular?

Rebecca peaked in 1981, when 16,737 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Rebecca rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Rebecca has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-39%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1981, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.