One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 771,186 recorded births

Melissa

#419 in the US in 2025

Where Melissa stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#419girls’ names · US 2025

Melissa was the 419th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 747 births.

peak 1979 · 34,050188019532025

Its moment was 1979, when 34,050 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#419US rank, 2025 (girls)
747US births in 2025
#2its best US rank, in 1977
1979peak year — 34,050 births
760,128US births since 1880
7,349NZ births since 1958
1,214E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Melissa's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Melissa was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Melissa in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.010612121
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Melissa in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 33% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Melissa in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Melissa has been registered 7,349 times since 1958, peaking in 1983 with 308 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

19001920194019601980200020200.08241649
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Melissa in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Melissa in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Melissa was registered 1,214 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2020 with 197 births. It ranked #321 for girls in 2025 on 136 births.

20200.03774
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Melissa in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#27133
1890#38442
1900#53140
1910#61047
1920#94959
1930#97157
1940#71495
1950#240980
1960#1094,412
1970#723,735
1980#431,629
1990#2014,000
2000#714,532
2010#1561,951
2020#349887

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Melissa most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California86,611
Texas57,957
New York56,743
Pennsylvania38,972
Ohio38,923
Illinois35,040
Florida29,795
Michigan29,076
New Jersey23,834
Indiana19,881

Questions about Melissa

How popular is the name Melissa?

Melissa ranked #419 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 747 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Melissa most popular?

Melissa peaked in 1979, when 34,050 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Melissa rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Melissa has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-33%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1979, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.