One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 713,154 recorded births

Amy

#257 in the US in 2025

Where Amy stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#257girls’ names · US 2025

Amy was the 257th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 1,200 births.

peak 1975 · 32,254188019532025

Its moment was 1975, when 32,254 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#257US rank, 2025 (girls)
1,200US births in 2025
#2its best US rank, in 1973
1975peak year — 32,254 births
701,631US births since 1880
8,629NZ births since 1900
1,041E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Amy's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Amy was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Amy in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.011062212
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Amy in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 28% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Amy in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Amy has been registered 8,629 times since 1900, peaking in 1984 with 325 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

19001920194019601980200020200.08651730
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Amy in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Amy in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Amy was registered 1,041 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 232 births. It ranked #366 for girls in 2025 on 117 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.04183
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Amy in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#108167
1890#135275
1900#165335
1910#225287
1920#263624
1930#332386
1940#321390
1950#2181,184
1960#775,973
1970#525,212
1980#819,833
1990#388,463
2000#1053,173
2010#1362,283
2020#2151,340

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Amy most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California55,780
New York46,030
Texas45,153
Ohio43,420
Pennsylvania40,016
Illinois35,888
Michigan32,851
Indiana21,861
Wisconsin20,541
Florida20,112

Questions about Amy

How popular is the name Amy?

Amy ranked #257 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 1,200 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Amy most popular?

Amy peaked in 1975, when 32,254 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Amy rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Amy has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-28%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1975, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.