One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 1,073,495 recorded births

Jessica

#665 in the US in 2025

Where Jessica stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#665girls’ names · US 2025

Jessica was the 665th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 424 births.

peak 1987 · 55,992188019532025

Its moment was 1987, when 55,992 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#665US rank, 2025 (girls)
424US births in 2025
#1its best US rank, in 1985
1987peak year — 55,992 births
1,050,729US births since 1880
13,482NZ births since 1958
5,706E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Jessica's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Jessica was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Jessica in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.016103220
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jessica in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 66% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jessica in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Jessica has been registered 13,482 times since 1958, peaking in 1990 with 603 births. It ranked #209 for girls in 2025 on 19 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.015113022
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jessica in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jessica in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Jessica was registered 5,706 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 1,439 births. It ranked #139 for girls in 2025 on 360 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.0257514
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jessica in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#6797
1890#61718
1900#76023
1910#81228
1920#1,15243
1930#1,21038
1940#91561
1950#399402
1960#408556
1970#984,021
1980#333,924
1990#146,486
2000#815,711
2010#923,200
2020#399780

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Jessica most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California136,185
Texas79,576
New York75,326
Florida47,219
Illinois46,670
Pennsylvania45,522
Ohio45,370
Michigan37,875
New Jersey32,343
Georgia28,307

Questions about Jessica

How popular is the name Jessica?

Jessica ranked #665 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 424 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Jessica most popular?

Jessica peaked in 1987, when 55,992 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Jessica rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Jessica has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-66%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1987, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.