One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 602,778 recorded births

Samantha

#151 in the US in 2025

Where Samantha stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#151girls’ names · US 2025

Samantha was the 151st most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 1,973 births.

peak 1990 · 25,868188019532025

Its moment was 1990, when 25,868 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#151US rank, 2025 (girls)
1,973US births in 2025
#3its best US rank, in 1998
1990peak year — 25,868 births
592,847US births since 1880
8,319NZ births since 1965
407E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Samantha's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Samantha was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Samantha in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.06841368
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Samantha in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 56% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Samantha in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Samantha has been registered 8,319 times since 1965, peaking in 1990 with 490 births. It ranked #209 for girls in 2025 on 19 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.012232445
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Samantha in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Samantha in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Samantha was registered 407 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 77 births. It ranked #778 for girls in 2025 on 47 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.01427
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Samantha in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#35221
1890#69315
1900#68827
1910#1,52110
1920#1,62626
1930#2,30614
1940#1,84519
1950#1,57635
1960#1,21281
1970#1492,295
1980#584,913
1990#525,868
2000#717,265
2010#158,411
2020#902,956

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Samantha most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California80,251
Texas47,146
New York46,727
Florida29,719
Illinois28,290
Pennsylvania26,228
Ohio24,955
Michigan21,648
New Jersey21,376
Massachusetts15,584

Questions about Samantha

How popular is the name Samantha?

Samantha ranked #151 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 1,973 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Samantha most popular?

Samantha peaked in 1990, when 25,868 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Samantha rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Samantha has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-56%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1990, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.