One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 575,060 recorded births

Douglas

#807 in the US in 2025

Where Douglas stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#807boys’ names · US 2025

Douglas was the 807th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 308 births.

peak 1957 · 16,730188019532025

Its moment was 1957, when 16,730 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#807US rank, 2025 (boys)
308US births in 2025
#23its best US rank, in 1942
1957peak year — 16,730 births
560,013US births since 1880
11,613NZ births since 1900
1,361E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Douglas's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Douglas was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Douglas in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0407813
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Douglas in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Douglas in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Douglas has been registered 11,613 times since 1900, peaking in 1920 with 269 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

19001920194019601980200020200.011342268
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Douglas in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Douglas in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Douglas was registered 1,361 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2021 with 223 births. It ranked #224 for boys in 2025 on 222 births. Across those years it has been rising.

20200.04181
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Douglas in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#31429
1890#27938
1900#189107
1910#172169
1920#1061,657
1930#892,166
1940#563,732
1950#2812,264
1960#3015,133
1970#3610,409
1980#625,180
1990#1033,544
2000#2741,173
2010#485536
2020#737334

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Douglas most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York45,077
California42,676
Ohio37,798
Michigan34,563
Pennsylvania29,469
Illinois26,165
Texas23,229
Minnesota16,828
New Jersey16,726
Indiana16,034

Questions about Douglas

How popular is the name Douglas?

Douglas ranked #807 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 308 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Douglas most popular?

Douglas peaked in 1957, when 16,730 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Douglas rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Douglas has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1957, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.