One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 402,897 recorded births

Bruce

#536 in the US in 2025

Where Bruce stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#536boys’ names · US 2025

Bruce was the 536th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 558 births.

peak 1956 · 14,660188019532025

Its moment was 1956, when 14,660 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#536US rank, 2025 (boys)
558US births in 2025
#25its best US rank, in 1952
1956peak year — 14,660 births
386,880US births since 1880
14,309NZ births since 1900
313E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Bruce's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Bruce was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Bruce in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0374748
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Bruce in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Bruce in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Bruce has been registered 14,309 times since 1900, peaking in 1950 with 470 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

19001920194019601980200020200.010362073
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Bruce in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Bruce in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Bruce was registered 313 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 62 births. It ranked #856 for boys in 2025 on 37 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.01020
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Bruce in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#24147
1890#21659
1900#21086
1910#23998
1920#149996
1930#1091,712
1940#553,789
1950#2612,674
1960#3910,972
1970#943,482
1980#1571,650
1990#2391,170
2000#432563
2010#533485
2020#498587

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Bruce most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York37,517
California30,783
Pennsylvania24,480
Illinois21,448
Ohio21,117
Michigan20,992
Minnesota14,456
Massachusetts14,171
New Jersey14,118
Texas13,530

Questions about Bruce

How popular is the name Bruce?

Bruce ranked #536 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 558 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Bruce most popular?

Bruce peaked in 1956, when 14,660 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Bruce rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Bruce has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1956, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.