One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 49,036 recorded births

Walker

#78 in the US in 2025

Where Walker stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#78boys’ names · US 2025

Walker was the 78th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 4,204 births.

peak 2022 · 4,250188019532025

Its moment was 2022, when 4,250 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#78US rank, 2025 (boys)
4,204US births in 2025
#78its best US rank, in 2022
2022peak year — 4,250 births
47,914US births since 1880
10NZ births since 2022
75E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Walker's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Walker was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Walker in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0123246
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Walker in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 346% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Walker in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Walker has been registered 10 times since 2022, peaking in 2022 with 10 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.02856
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Walker in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Walker in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Walker was registered 75 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2022 with 20 births. It ranked #2,439 for boys in 2025 on 9 births.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.03.57.0
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Walker in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#31429
1890#32229
1900#43027
1910#44738
1920#490151
1930#64491
1940#71173
1950#93454
1960#1,38233
1970#1,31440
1980#1,17660
1990#842148
2000#426578
2010#426649
2020#2061,861

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Walker most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Texas4,284
Georgia2,833
California2,694
North Carolina2,369
Tennessee2,063
Florida1,812
Alabama1,621
Ohio1,580
South Carolina1,490
Virginia1,459

Questions about Walker

How popular is the name Walker?

Walker ranked #78 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 4,204 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Walker most popular?

Walker peaked in 2022, when 4,250 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Walker rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Walker has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+346%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2022, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.