One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Given to both sexes · 70,027 recorded births

Skyler

#783 in the US in 2025

Where Skyler stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#783boys’ names · US 2025

Skyler was the 783rd most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 325 births.

peak 2002 · 1,558188019532025

Its moment was 2002, when 1,558 babies were given it. In 3 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#783US rank, 2025 (boys)
325US births in 2025
#213its best US rank, in 1994
2002peak year — 1,558 births
41,841US births since 1954
69E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Skyler's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Skyler was under the floor in 3 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Skyler in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.04080
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Skyler in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 53% as a share of boys' births.

Skyler is given to both sexes: 41,910 male and 28,117 female births on record. The two curves rarely move together, which is why they are drawn separately rather than summed.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Skyler in New Zealand

Skyler never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Skyler in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Skyler was registered 69 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2022 with 16 births. It ranked #2,268 for boys in 2025 on 10 births.

20200.01734
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Skyler in England and Wales, 2019–2025
boysgirls

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1960#3,3377
1970#3,8367
1980#1,01979
1990#301847
2000#2301,472
2010#2621,320
2020#568493

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Skyler most often since 1954. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California4,461
Texas2,232
Utah2,102
Florida1,941
Washington1,771
New York1,557
Ohio1,490
Indiana1,423
Pennsylvania1,260
Missouri1,242

Questions about Skyler

How popular is the name Skyler?

Skyler ranked #783 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 325 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Skyler most popular?

Skyler peaked in 2002, when 1,558 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Skyler rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Skyler has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-53%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2002, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.