One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 27,833 recorded births

Rosalind

#1,518 in the US in 2025

Where Rosalind stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,518girls’ names · US 2025

Rosalind was the 1,518th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 140 births.

peak 1965 · 652BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR — NOT PUBLISHED188019532025

Its moment was 1965, when 652 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,518US rank, 2025 (girls)
140US births in 2025
#292its best US rank, in 1942
1965peak year — 652 births
27,136US births since 1888
517NZ births since 1939
180E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Rosalind's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Rosalind was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Rosalind in the United States

18801900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR0.02040
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Rosalind in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Rosalind in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Rosalind has been registered 517 times since 1939, peaking in 1955 with 26 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.089177
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Rosalind in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Rosalind in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Rosalind was registered 180 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2021 with 36 births. It ranked #1,639 for girls in 2025 on 18 births. Across those years it has been falling.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.06.613
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Rosalind in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1890#75813
1900#83320
1910#55055
1920#469210
1930#606130
1940#332368
1950#321571
1960#375649
1970#520368
1980#1,28699
1990#1,81379
2000#3,45338
2010#3,30649
2020#1,422153

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Rosalind most often since 1888. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York4,335
California2,137
Pennsylvania1,319
Illinois1,313
Texas1,297
Ohio1,035
Michigan1,021
Louisiana911
New Jersey801
Florida710

Questions about Rosalind

How popular is the name Rosalind?

Rosalind ranked #1,518 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 140 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Rosalind most popular?

Rosalind peaked in 1965, when 652 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Rosalind rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Rosalind has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1965, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.