One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 63,033 recorded births

Nova

#46 in the US in 2025

Where Nova stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#46girls’ names · US 2025

Nova was the 46th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 4,657 births.

peak 2022 · 5,927188019532025

Its moment was 2022, when 5,927 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#46US rank, 2025 (girls)
4,657US births in 2025
#32its best US rank, in 2021
2022peak year — 5,927 births
55,783US births since 1885
385NZ births since 2007
3,496E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Nova's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Nova was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Nova in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0181361
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Nova in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 125% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Nova in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Nova has been registered 385 times since 2007, peaking in 2025 with 35 births. It ranked #113 for girls in 2025 on 35 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0127254
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Nova in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Nova in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Nova was registered 3,496 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2025 with 650 births. It ranked #68 for girls in 2025 on 650 births. Across those years it has been rising.

20200.0128257
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Nova in England and Wales, 2019–2025
girlsboys

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1890#69315
1900#65629
1910#75332
1920#690111
1930#81875
1940#1,08844
1950#1,76429
1960#1,95334
1970#1,75551
1980#1,70466
1990#4,00325
2000#2,33266
2010#1,127218
2020#385,006

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Nova most often since 1885. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Texas4,562
California4,299
Florida2,933
Ohio2,444
Georgia2,303
North Carolina2,270
New York2,166
Pennsylvania2,050
Michigan1,799
Illinois1,661

Questions about Nova

How popular is the name Nova?

Nova ranked #46 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 4,657 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Nova most popular?

Nova peaked in 2022, when 5,927 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Nova rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Nova has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+125%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2022, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.