One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 50,751 recorded births

Mollie

#1,113 in the US in 2025

Where Mollie stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,113girls’ names · US 2025

Mollie was the 1,113th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 212 births.

peak 1915 · 738188019532025

Its moment was 1915, when 738 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,113US rank, 2025 (girls)
212US births in 2025
#79its best US rank, in 1884
1915peak year — 738 births
48,164US births since 1880
334NZ births since 1909
2,253E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Mollie's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Mollie was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Mollie in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0156311
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Mollie in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Mollie in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Mollie has been registered 334 times since 1909, peaking in 1915 with 18 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.079159
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Mollie in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Mollie in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Mollie was registered 2,253 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2020 with 455 births. It ranked #242 for girls in 2025 on 192 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.085170
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Mollie in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#81283
1890#118349
1900#138437
1910#170399
1920#275560
1930#357353
1940#439241
1950#570214
1960#782171
1970#753196
1980#637286
1990#465527
2000#580448
2010#675428
2020#1,089224

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Mollie most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York2,999
Texas2,665
North Carolina1,955
Georgia1,718
Pennsylvania1,687
California1,636
Ohio1,596
Kentucky1,541
Alabama1,425
Tennessee1,302

Questions about Mollie

How popular is the name Mollie?

Mollie ranked #1,113 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 212 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Mollie most popular?

Mollie peaked in 1915, when 738 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Mollie rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Mollie has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1915, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.