One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 184,530 recorded births

Max

#180 in the US in 2025

Where Max stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#180boys’ names · US 2025

Max was the 180th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 2,025 births.

peak 2009 · 3,958188019532025

Its moment was 2009, when 3,958 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#180US rank, 2025 (boys)
2,025US births in 2025
#96its best US rank, in 2011
2009peak year — 3,958 births
167,458US births since 1880
5,933NZ births since 1912
10,004E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Max's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Max was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Max in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0104208
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Max in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 34% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Max in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Max has been registered 5,933 times since 1912, peaking in 2010 with 230 births. It ranked #33 for boys in 2025 on 85 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.05701139
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Max in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Max in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Max was registered 10,004 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 1,835 births. It ranked #48 for boys in 2025 on 1,061 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.0302604
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Max in England and Wales, 2019–2025
boysgirls

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#22552
1890#14399
1900#149141
1910#114277
1920#1121,561
1930#1431,181
1940#165952
1950#240755
1960#297669
1970#368486
1980#362486
1990#1711,791
2000#1642,355
2010#983,848
2020#1472,486

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Max most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California17,788
New York14,330
Texas10,327
Illinois7,843
Indiana7,244
Pennsylvania6,968
Michigan6,332
Ohio6,281
Florida5,373
Massachusetts4,208

Questions about Max

How popular is the name Max?

Max ranked #180 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 2,025 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Max most popular?

Max peaked in 2009, when 3,958 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Max rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Max has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-34%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2009, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.