One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 108,699 recorded births

Makayla

#566 in the US in 2025

Where Makayla stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#566girls’ names · US 2025

Makayla was the 566th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 530 births.

peak 2008 · 5,957188019532025

Its moment was 2008, when 5,957 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#566US rank, 2025 (girls)
530US births in 2025
#37its best US rank, in 2008
2008peak year — 5,957 births
108,030US births since 1971
519NZ births since 1994
150E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Makayla's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Makayla was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Makayla in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0158315
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Makayla in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 70% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Makayla in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Makayla has been registered 519 times since 1994, peaking in 2009 with 37 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0106212
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Makayla in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Makayla in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Makayla was registered 150 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 34 births. It ranked #1,407 for girls in 2025 on 22 births. Across those years it has been falling.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.06.112
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Makayla in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1980#4,14818
1990#796252
2000#674,917
2010#435,397
2020#325954

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Makayla most often since 1971. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Texas9,746
California9,242
Florida5,788
Georgia4,877
North Carolina4,781
Ohio4,770
New York4,500
Michigan4,016
Illinois3,906
Pennsylvania3,642

Questions about Makayla

How popular is the name Makayla?

Makayla ranked #566 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 530 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Makayla most popular?

Makayla peaked in 2008, when 5,957 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Makayla rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Makayla has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-70%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2008, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.