One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 1,426 recorded births

Madalene

#10,917 in the US in 2025

Where Madalene stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#10,917girls’ names · US 2025

Madalene was the 10,917th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 8 births.

peak 1919 · 49BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR — NOT PUBLISHED188019532025

Its moment was 1919, when 49 babies were given it. In 26 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#10,917US rank, 2025 (girls)
8US births in 2025
#1,025its best US rank, in 1915
1919peak year — 49 births
1,426US births since 1890
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Madalene's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Madalene was under the floor in 26 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Madalene in the United States

18801900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR0.02.24.3
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Madalene in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2011 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 25% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Madalene in New Zealand

Madalene never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Madalene in England & Wales

Madalene does not appear in the ONS list for England and Wales. That means it was given to fewer than 3 babies in every year from 2019 to 2025 — not that it is unused there. ONS publishes only those seven years, so a name that had its moment in England before 2019 is invisible here however common it once was.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1890#1,3385
1900#1,3199
1910#1,20714
1920#1,06249
1930#2,02317
1940#2,20314
1950below floor<5
1960#5,6966
1970#7,9955
1980below floor<5
1990#7,88010
2000#11,8017
2010#11,2469
2020#13,4536

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Madalene most often since 1890. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

Questions about Madalene

How popular is the name Madalene?

Madalene ranked #10,917 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 8 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Madalene most popular?

Madalene peaked in 1919, when 49 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Madalene rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Madalene has been rising between 2011 and 2025 (+25%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1919, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.