One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Given to both sexes · 299,466 recorded births

Lee

#725 in the US in 2025

Where Lee stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#725boys’ names · US 2025

Lee was the 725th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 366 births.

peak 1951 · 3,682188019532025

Its moment was 1951, when 3,682 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#725US rank, 2025 (boys)
366US births in 2025
#39its best US rank, in 1900
1951peak year — 3,682 births
233,627US births since 1880
2,137NZ births since 1951
225E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Lee's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Lee was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Lee in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0224449
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Lee in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

Lee is given to both sexes: 235,989 male and 63,477 female births on record. The two curves rarely move together, which is why they are drawn separately rather than summed.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Lee in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Lee has been registered 2,137 times since 1951, peaking in 1969 with 88 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0186371
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Lee in New Zealand, 1900–2025
boysgirls

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Lee in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Lee was registered 225 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 50 births. It ranked #1,093 for boys in 2025 on 27 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.08.216
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Lee in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#43361
1890#43410
1900#39675
1910#49741
1920#822,321
1930#822,361
1940#802,624
1950#913,611
1960#1163,430
1970#1182,790
1980#1252,209
1990#2131,450
2000#469502
2010#676353
2020#768313

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Lee most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Texas16,998
California13,287
Pennsylvania11,384
New York11,305
Illinois9,839
Ohio8,970
Mississippi8,747
Michigan8,246
North Carolina8,008
Georgia7,309

Questions about Lee

How popular is the name Lee?

Lee ranked #725 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 366 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Lee most popular?

Lee peaked in 1951, when 3,682 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Lee rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Lee has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1951, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.