One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 136,677 recorded births

Layla

#36 in the US in 2025

Where Layla stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#36girls’ names · US 2025

Layla was the 36th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 5,338 births.

peak 2019 · 6,523188019532025

Its moment was 2019, when 6,523 babies were given it. In 14 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#36US rank, 2025 (girls)
5,338US births in 2025
#23its best US rank, in 2019
2019peak year — 6,523 births
129,136US births since 1950
1,423NZ births since 1993
6,118E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Layla's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Layla was under the floor in 14 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Layla in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0194389
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Layla in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Layla in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Layla has been registered 1,423 times since 1993, peaking in 2022 with 102 births. It ranked #32 for girls in 2025 on 89 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0329659
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Layla in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Layla in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Layla was registered 6,118 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 1,025 births. It ranked #50 for girls in 2025 on 833 births.

20200.0183366
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Layla in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1950#4,3157
1960below floor<5
1970#6,3627
1980#1,083130
1990#1,247132
2000#407698
2010#365,901
2020#246,228

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Layla most often since 1950. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California14,281
Texas12,977
Florida7,846
New York6,850
Ohio5,178
Illinois5,046
Pennsylvania4,878
North Carolina4,583
Georgia4,567
Michigan4,343

Questions about Layla

How popular is the name Layla?

Layla ranked #36 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 5,338 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Layla most popular?

Layla peaked in 2019, when 6,523 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Layla rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Layla has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2019, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.