One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 35,315 recorded births

Lamar

#1,514 in the US in 2025

Where Lamar stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,514boys’ names · US 2025

Lamar was the 1,514th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 115 births.

peak 1989 · 737BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR — NOT PUBLISHED188019532025

Its moment was 1989, when 737 babies were given it. In 4 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,514US rank, 2025 (boys)
115US births in 2025
#314its best US rank, in 1980
1989peak year — 737 births
33,967US births since 1882
20E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Lamar's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Lamar was under the floor in 4 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Lamar in the United States

18801900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR0.01837
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Lamar in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 44% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Lamar in New Zealand

Lamar never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Lamar in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Lamar was registered 20 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 4 births. It ranked #4,274 for boys in 2025 on 4 births.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.01.63.1
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Lamar in England and Wales, 2019–2025
boysgirls

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1890#9945
1900#62316
1910#47434
1920#447183
1930#376228
1940#393212
1950#406276
1960#485267
1970#406400
1980#314611
1990#350689
2000#638286
2010#701333
2020#1,086182

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Lamar most often since 1882. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Georgia3,857
Pennsylvania2,556
California1,976
Florida1,934
New York1,820
Ohio1,760
Illinois1,694
Alabama1,616
Michigan1,445
Mississippi1,410

Questions about Lamar

How popular is the name Lamar?

Lamar ranked #1,514 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 115 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Lamar most popular?

Lamar peaked in 1989, when 737 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Lamar rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Lamar has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-44%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1989, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.