One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 71,242 recorded births

Kristy

#5,099 in the US in 2025

Where Kristy stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#5,099girls’ names · US 2025

Kristy was the 5,099th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 25 births.

peak 1978 · 5,332188019532025

Its moment was 1978, when 5,332 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#5,099US rank, 2025 (girls)
25US births in 2025
#51its best US rank, in 1978
1978peak year — 5,332 births
70,524US births since 1941
718NZ births since 1973
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Kristy's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Kristy was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Kristy in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0174348
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Kristy in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 55% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Kristy in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Kristy has been registered 718 times since 1973, peaking in 1978 with 63 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0169338
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Kristy in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Kristy in England & Wales

Kristy does not appear in the ONS list for England and Wales. That means it was given to fewer than 3 babies in every year from 2019 to 2025 — not that it is unused there. ONS publishes only those seven years, so a name that had its moment in England before 2019 is invisible here however common it once was.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1950#842109
1960#417535
1970#1971,632
1980#784,059
1990#2481,133
2000#832269
2010#1,897106
2020#3,22148

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Kristy most often since 1941. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California6,750
Texas4,852
New York3,581
Pennsylvania3,531
Ohio3,301
Michigan3,271
Illinois2,852
Georgia2,310
Tennessee2,294
North Carolina2,161

Questions about Kristy

How popular is the name Kristy?

Kristy ranked #5,099 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 25 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Kristy most popular?

Kristy peaked in 1978, when 5,332 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Kristy rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Kristy has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-55%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1978, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.