One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 388,554 recorded births

Jane

#221 in the US in 2025

Where Jane stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#221girls’ names · US 2025

Jane was the 221st most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 1,380 births.

peak 1947 · 9,943188019532025

Its moment was 1947, when 9,943 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#221US rank, 2025 (girls)
1,380US births in 2025
#35its best US rank, in 1946
1947peak year — 9,943 births
379,876US births since 1880
7,377NZ births since 1900
168E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Jane's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Jane was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Jane in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0292584
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jane in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 34% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jane in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Jane has been registered 7,377 times since 1900, peaking in 1957 with 217 births. It ranked #357 for girls in 2025 on 11 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0451902
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jane in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jane in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Jane was registered 168 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2022 with 33 births. It ranked #1,110 for girls in 2025 on 30 births. Across those years it has been rising.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.06.313
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jane in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#98215
1890#108372
1900#128495
1910#116709
1920#485,054
1930#554,575
1940#475,091
1950#398,964
1960#676,586
1970#2021,601
1980#312775
1990#345773
2000#437647
2010#385833
2020#2631,169

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Jane most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York39,893
Pennsylvania33,104
Ohio22,685
Illinois20,341
California19,014
Massachusetts17,156
Michigan15,921
Wisconsin14,333
New Jersey13,450
Texas11,977

Questions about Jane

How popular is the name Jane?

Jane ranked #221 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 1,380 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Jane most popular?

Jane peaked in 1947, when 9,943 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Jane rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Jane has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+34%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1947, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.