One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 33,614 recorded births

Jamal

#1,196 in the US in 2025

Where Jamal stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,196boys’ names · US 2025

Jamal was the 1,196th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 169 births.

peak 1993 · 1,245188019532025

Its moment was 1993, when 1,245 babies were given it. In 4 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,196US rank, 2025 (boys)
169US births in 2025
#233its best US rank, in 1993
1993peak year — 1,245 births
33,235US births since 1946
22NZ births since 1993
357E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Jamal's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Jamal was under the floor in 4 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Jamal in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.03264
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jamal in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 47% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jamal in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Jamal has been registered 22 times since 1993, peaking in 1996 with 11 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.02652
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jamal in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jamal in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Jamal was registered 357 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 60 births. It ranked #627 for boys in 2025 on 59 births.

20200.01122
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jamal in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1950#3,3296
1960#1,81220
1970#477284
1980#327581
1990#2471,112
2000#365726
2010#609407
2020#910245

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Jamal most often since 1946. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York4,019
California2,535
Florida2,213
Georgia1,892
Illinois1,808
Pennsylvania1,745
Texas1,693
Maryland1,514
New Jersey1,390
Louisiana1,388

Questions about Jamal

How popular is the name Jamal?

Jamal ranked #1,196 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 169 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Jamal most popular?

Jamal peaked in 1993, when 1,245 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Jamal rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Jamal has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-47%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1993, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.