One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 31,872 recorded births

Izabella

#564 in the US in 2025

Where Izabella stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#564girls’ names · US 2025

Izabella was the 564th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 532 births.

peak 2010 · 2,254188019532025

Its moment was 2010, when 2,254 babies were given it. In 2 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#564US rank, 2025 (girls)
532US births in 2025
#138its best US rank, in 2010
2010peak year — 2,254 births
31,149US births since 1987
212NZ births since 2005
511E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Izabella's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Izabella was under the floor in 2 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Izabella in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.063127
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Izabella in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 52% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Izabella in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Izabella has been registered 212 times since 2005, peaking in 2011 with 26 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.077154
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Izabella in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Izabella in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Izabella was registered 511 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 96 births. It ranked #863 for girls in 2025 on 41 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.01734
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Izabella in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1990#6,86712
2000#798286
2010#1382,254
2020#340912

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Izabella most often since 1987. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California4,756
Texas3,157
Florida1,855
New York1,412
Illinois1,363
Ohio1,242
Pennsylvania1,120
Michigan930
Arizona923
Indiana801

Questions about Izabella

How popular is the name Izabella?

Izabella ranked #564 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 532 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Izabella most popular?

Izabella peaked in 2010, when 2,254 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Izabella rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Izabella has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-52%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2010, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.