One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 83,406 recorded births

Hilda

#2,998 in the US in 2025

Where Hilda stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#2,998girls’ names · US 2025

Hilda was the 2,998th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 55 births.

peak 1921 · 2,128188019532025

Its moment was 1921, when 2,128 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#2,998US rank, 2025 (girls)
55US births in 2025
#87its best US rank, in 1899
1921peak year — 2,128 births
81,022US births since 1880
2,313NZ births since 1900
71E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Hilda's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Hilda was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Hilda in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0133266
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Hilda in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 52% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Hilda in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Hilda has been registered 2,313 times since 1900, peaking in 1912 with 95 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0488977
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Hilda in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Hilda in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Hilda was registered 71 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2025 with 16 births. It ranked #1,809 for girls in 2025 on 16 births. Across those years it has been rising.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.03.26.3
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Hilda in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#19860
1890#127304
1900#101663
1910#108793
1920#1252,050
1930#1581,303
1940#215797
1950#296682
1960#456458
1970#588298
1980#684253
1990#1,104158
2000#2,01682
2010#3,40947
2020#3,39945

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Hilda most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York6,340
Texas6,001
North Carolina4,893
Pennsylvania4,677
California4,148
Louisiana3,163
Virginia2,406
Georgia2,306
Ohio2,277
Maryland2,142

Questions about Hilda

How popular is the name Hilda?

Hilda ranked #2,998 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 55 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Hilda most popular?

Hilda peaked in 1921, when 2,128 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Hilda rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Hilda has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+52%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1921, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.