One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 560,686 recorded births

Harold

#991 in the US in 2025

Where Harold stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#991boys’ names · US 2025

Harold was the 991st most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 230 births.

peak 1924 · 14,149188019532025

Its moment was 1924, when 14,149 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#991US rank, 2025 (boys)
230US births in 2025
#12its best US rank, in 1915
1924peak year — 14,149 births
551,632US births since 1880
6,249NZ births since 1900
157E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Harold's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Harold was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Harold in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.06431285
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Harold in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Harold in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Harold has been registered 6,249 times since 1900, peaking in 1904 with 206 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

19001920194019601980200020200.09931987
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Harold in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Harold in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Harold was registered 157 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2024 with 29 births. It ranked #1,226 for boys in 2025 on 23 births.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.05.210
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Harold in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#116113
1890#46408
1900#201,245
1910#181,909
1920#1213,678
1930#1811,660
1940#238,080
1950#457,214
1960#924,679
1970#1222,726
1980#2071,189
1990#324771
2000#538406
2010#744305
2020#932238

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Harold most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York46,023
Pennsylvania34,469
Illinois30,867
Ohio30,737
Michigan23,143
Texas21,447
California20,184
Missouri18,854
Indiana16,562
North Carolina15,984

Questions about Harold

How popular is the name Harold?

Harold ranked #991 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 230 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Harold most popular?

Harold peaked in 1924, when 14,149 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Harold rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Harold has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1924, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.