One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 273,231 recorded births

Gladys

#3,211 in the US in 2025

Where Gladys stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#3,211girls’ names · US 2025

Gladys was the 3,211th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 49 births.

peak 1920 · 8,819188019532025

Its moment was 1920, when 8,819 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#3,211US rank, 2025 (girls)
49US births in 2025
#11its best US rank, in 1901
1920peak year — 8,819 births
266,718US births since 1880
5,466NZ births since 1900
24E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Gladys's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Gladys was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Gladys in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.05591118
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Gladys in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Gladys in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Gladys has been registered 5,466 times since 1900, peaking in 1908 with 238 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

19001920194019601980200020200.012042407
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Gladys in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Gladys in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Gladys was registered 24 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2023 with 8 births. It ranked #4,866 for girls in 2025 on 4 births.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.01.63.1
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Gladys in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#36720
1890#82525
1900#212,733
1910#153,842
1920#228,819
1930#485,066
1940#1162,246
1950#1821,526
1960#320860
1970#522366
1980#628290
1990#529448
2000#1,108184
2010#1,942103
2020#2,27778

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Gladys most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York16,420
Pennsylvania13,445
Texas13,373
North Carolina10,727
Georgia9,513
Virginia8,986
Illinois8,527
Alabama7,920
Tennessee7,803
Kentucky7,628

Questions about Gladys

How popular is the name Gladys?

Gladys ranked #3,211 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 49 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Gladys most popular?

Gladys peaked in 1920, when 8,819 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Gladys rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Gladys has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1920, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.