One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 43,942 recorded births

Freda

#6,546 in the US in 2025

Where Freda stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#6,546girls’ names · US 2025

Freda was the 6,546th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 17 births.

peak 1918 · 1,025188019532025

Its moment was 1918, when 1,025 babies were given it. In 1 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#6,546US rank, 2025 (girls)
17US births in 2025
#161its best US rank, in 1897
1918peak year — 1,025 births
42,527US births since 1880
1,334NZ births since 1900
81E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Freda's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Freda was under the floor in 1 year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Freda in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.060119
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Freda in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2015 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 57% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Freda in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Freda has been registered 1,334 times since 1900, peaking in 1908 with 63 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0299599
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Freda in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Freda in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Freda was registered 81 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 15 births. It ranked #2,439 for girls in 2025 on 11 births.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.02.75.5
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Freda in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#26534
1890#215127
1900#170321
1910#193345
1920#201974
1930#253610
1940#284487
1950#387437
1960#462449
1970#906145
1980#1,29998
1990#3,62329
2000#7,58013
2010#8,27114
2020#6,32518

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Freda most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Pennsylvania2,891
West Virginia2,862
Ohio2,730
Kentucky1,888
Missouri1,687
Texas1,617
New York1,559
Illinois1,552
Oklahoma1,547
Arkansas1,340

Questions about Freda

How popular is the name Freda?

Freda ranked #6,546 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 17 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Freda most popular?

Freda peaked in 1918, when 1,025 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Freda rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Freda has been rising between 2015 and 2025 (+57%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1918, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.