One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 41,037 recorded births

Essie

#3,296 in the US in 2025

Where Essie stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#3,296girls’ names · US 2025

Essie was the 3,296th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 47 births.

peak 1921 · 1,032188019532025

Its moment was 1921, when 1,032 babies were given it. In 1 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#3,296US rank, 2025 (girls)
47US births in 2025
#126its best US rank, in 1896
1921peak year — 1,032 births
39,682US births since 1880
143E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Essie's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Essie was under the floor in 1 year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Essie in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.083166
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Essie in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 33% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Essie in New Zealand

Essie never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Essie in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Essie was registered 143 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2021 with 33 births. It ranked #2,006 for girls in 2025 on 14 births. Across those years it has been falling.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.06.012
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Essie in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#16878
1890#138256
1900#129492
1910#134620
1920#197996
1930#250617
1940#309420
1950#459313
1960#885139
1970#1,82848
1980#3,50623
1990#4,00325
2000#8,53411
2010#9,23112
2020#4,16933

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Essie most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Georgia4,470
Alabama3,399
Mississippi3,365
South Carolina2,635
North Carolina2,516
Texas2,007
Louisiana1,701
Arkansas1,626
Florida1,431
Tennessee922

Questions about Essie

How popular is the name Essie?

Essie ranked #3,296 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 47 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Essie most popular?

Essie peaked in 1921, when 1,032 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Essie rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Essie has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+33%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1921, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.