One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 74,951 recorded births

Elliott

#160 in the US in 2025

Where Elliott stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#160boys’ names · US 2025

Elliott was the 160th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 2,287 births.

peak 2019 · 2,453188019532025

Its moment was 2019, when 2,453 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#160US rank, 2025 (boys)
2,287US births in 2025
#158its best US rank, in 2020
2019peak year — 2,453 births
62,551US births since 1880
417NZ births since 1990
3,772E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Elliott's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Elliott was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Elliott in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.069137
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Elliott in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Elliott in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Elliott has been registered 417 times since 1990, peaking in 2015 with 29 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.073146
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Elliott in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Elliott in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Elliott was registered 3,772 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 728 births. It ranked #121 for boys in 2025 on 418 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.0120240
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Elliott in England and Wales, 2019–2025
boysgirls

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#37321
1890#35824
1900#38533
1910#39644
1920#450180
1930#441177
1940#411197
1950#424250
1960#477275
1970#526236
1980#462333
1990#358672
2000#539405
2010#3151,014
2020#1582,365

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Elliott most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California5,432
New York4,597
Texas4,320
Illinois2,919
Ohio2,851
Pennsylvania2,714
Florida2,318
Michigan2,157
North Carolina2,088
Washington1,884

Questions about Elliott

How popular is the name Elliott?

Elliott ranked #160 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 2,287 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Elliott most popular?

Elliott peaked in 2019, when 2,453 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Elliott rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Elliott has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2019, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.