One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 841,547 recorded births

Donna

#1,962 in the US in 2025

Where Donna stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,962girls’ names · US 2025

Donna was the 1,962nd most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 98 births.

peak 1959 · 36,468188019532025

Its moment was 1959, when 36,468 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,962US rank, 2025 (girls)
98US births in 2025
#5its best US rank, in 1959
1959peak year — 36,468 births
831,641US births since 1880
7,651NZ births since 1944
22E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Donna's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Donna was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Donna in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.09011802
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Donna in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Donna in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Donna has been registered 7,651 times since 1944, peaking in 1961 with 440 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

19001920194019601980200020200.09091818
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Donna in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Donna in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Donna was registered 22 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2020 with 6 births. It did not clear the ONS reporting floor of 3 in 2025.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.01.12.2
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Donna in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#40317
1890#44633
1900#37579
1910#378107
1920#202959
1930#375,978
1940#239,232
1950#1321,629
1960#534,138
1970#329,968
1980#1442,009
1990#319861
2000#659370
2010#983258
2020#1,545137

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Donna most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York68,416
Pennsylvania62,223
California52,401
Illinois48,352
Ohio46,362
Texas37,590
Michigan35,211
Massachusetts31,610
New Jersey29,008
Missouri23,909

Questions about Donna

How popular is the name Donna?

Donna ranked #1,962 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 98 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Donna most popular?

Donna peaked in 1959, when 36,468 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Donna rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Donna has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1959, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.