One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 135,310 recorded births

Deanna

#2,173 in the US in 2025

Where Deanna stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#2,173girls’ names · US 2025

Deanna was the 2,173rd most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 85 births.

peak 1970 · 4,331188019532025

Its moment was 1970, when 4,331 babies were given it. In 15 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#2,173US rank, 2025 (girls)
85US births in 2025
#88its best US rank, in 1969
1970peak year — 4,331 births
134,477US births since 1899
764NZ births since 1938
69E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Deanna's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Deanna was under the floor in 15 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Deanna in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0124248
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Deanna in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 50% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Deanna in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Deanna has been registered 764 times since 1938, peaking in 1978 with 32 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.086172
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Deanna in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Deanna in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Deanna was registered 69 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 17 births. It ranked #4,200 for girls in 2025 on 5 births. Across those years it has been falling.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.03.26.3
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Deanna in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1900below floor<5
1910#1,9357
1920#4,9755
1930#3,6587
1940#1361,802
1950#253891
1960#1732,295
1970#904,331
1980#1491,868
1990#1591,854
2000#3031,051
2010#712396
2020#1,769112

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Deanna most often since 1899. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California16,248
New York8,264
Texas7,336
Illinois7,242
Ohio7,219
Michigan6,751
Pennsylvania6,096
Florida4,366
Indiana4,114
Missouri3,771

Questions about Deanna

How popular is the name Deanna?

Deanna ranked #2,173 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 85 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Deanna most popular?

Deanna peaked in 1970, when 4,331 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Deanna rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Deanna has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-50%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1970, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.