One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 32,986 recorded births

Clint

#2,363 in the US in 2025

Where Clint stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#2,363boys’ names · US 2025

Clint was the 2,363rd most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 58 births.

peak 1980 · 1,274188019532025

Its moment was 1980, when 1,274 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#2,363US rank, 2025 (boys)
58US births in 2025
#195its best US rank, in 1980
1980peak year — 1,274 births
32,731US births since 1880
255NZ births since 1969
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Clint's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Clint was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Clint in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.03671
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Clint in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 48% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Clint in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Clint has been registered 255 times since 1969, peaking in 1974 with 35 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.066131
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Clint in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Clint in England & Wales

Clint does not appear in the ONS list for England and Wales. That means it was given to fewer than 3 babies in every year from 2019 to 2025 — not that it is unused there. ONS publishes only those seven years, so a name that had its moment in England before 2019 is invisible here however common it once was.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#32527
1890#38921
1900#49022
1910#58224
1920#81667
1930#85559
1940#81858
1950#88560
1960#361471
1970#268805
1980#1951,274
1990#375618
2000#919168
2010#1,323129
2020#1,347132

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Clint most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Texas3,978
California2,286
Louisiana1,283
Illinois1,181
Ohio1,149
Florida954
Indiana934
Oklahoma923
Tennessee897
Missouri896

Questions about Clint

How popular is the name Clint?

Clint ranked #2,363 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 58 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Clint most popular?

Clint peaked in 1980, when 1,274 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Clint rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Clint has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-48%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1980, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.