One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Given to both sexes · 3,817 recorded births

Charleston

#2,991 in the US in 2025

Where Charleston stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#2,991boys’ names · US 2025

Charleston was the 2,991st most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 41 births.

peak 2015 · 88BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR — NOT PUBLISHED188019532025

Its moment was 2015, when 88 babies were given it. In 16 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#2,991US rank, 2025 (boys)
41US births in 2025
#1,581its best US rank, in 1984
2015peak year — 88 births
2,508US births since 1914
4E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Charleston's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Charleston was under the floor in 16 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Charleston in the United States

18801900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR0.07.114
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Charleston in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 30% as a share of boys' births.

Charleston is given to both sexes: 2,512 male and 1,305 female births on record. The two curves rarely move together, which is why they are drawn separately rather than summed.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Charleston in New Zealand

Charleston never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Charleston in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Charleston was registered 4 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 4 births. It did not clear the ONS reporting floor of 3 in 2025.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.00.71.3
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Charleston in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1920#2,9679
1930below floor<5
1940#2,8717
1950#2,7708
1960#2,53511
1970#2,73912
1980#2,21323
1990#1,73046
2000#2,92230
2010#2,57947
2020#2,32358

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Charleston most often since 1914. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

Questions about Charleston

How popular is the name Charleston?

Charleston ranked #2,991 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 41 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Charleston most popular?

Charleston peaked in 2015, when 88 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Charleston rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Charleston has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-30%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2015, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.