One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 47,287 recorded births

Cassie

#1,279 in the US in 2025

Where Cassie stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,279girls’ names · US 2025

Cassie was the 1,279th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 175 births.

peak 1982 · 2,193188019532025

Its moment was 1982, when 2,193 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,279US rank, 2025 (girls)
175US births in 2025
#137its best US rank, in 1982
1982peak year — 2,193 births
46,642US births since 1880
98NZ births since 1986
547E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Cassie's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Cassie was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Cassie in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.065130
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Cassie in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Cassie in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Cassie has been registered 98 times since 1986, peaking in 2019 with 13 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.04183
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Cassie in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Cassie in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Cassie was registered 547 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2023 with 96 births. It ranked #514 for girls in 2025 on 78 births. Across those years it has been rising.

20200.01937
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Cassie in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#27133
1890#30168
1900#36585
1910#375108
1920#523181
1930#657109
1940#92860
1950#758130
1960#813163
1970#559329
1980#314770
1990#2291,253
2000#348886
2010#1,149212
2020#1,246182

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Cassie most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Texas3,888
California2,967
North Carolina1,945
Georgia1,913
Ohio1,769
Florida1,579
Tennessee1,553
Michigan1,456
New York1,374
Illinois1,373

Questions about Cassie

How popular is the name Cassie?

Cassie ranked #1,279 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 175 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Cassie most popular?

Cassie peaked in 1982, when 2,193 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Cassie rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Cassie has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1982, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.