One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 127,161 recorded births

Angelina

#347 in the US in 2025

Where Angelina stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#347girls’ names · US 2025

Angelina was the 347th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 875 births.

peak 2005 · 5,813188019532025

Its moment was 2005, when 5,813 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#347US rank, 2025 (girls)
875US births in 2025
#43its best US rank, in 2005
2005peak year — 5,813 births
126,281US births since 1880
501NZ births since 1971
379E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Angelina's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Angelina was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Angelina in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0157315
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Angelina in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 48% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Angelina in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Angelina has been registered 501 times since 1971, peaking in 2004 with 43 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0127253
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Angelina in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Angelina in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Angelina was registered 379 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2022 with 63 births. It ranked #792 for girls in 2025 on 46 births.

20200.01224
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Angelina in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#5809
1890#42935
1900#306115
1910#243249
1920#1931,035
1930#212832
1940#450228
1950#492268
1960#659237
1970#422528
1980#307797
1990#2611,099
2000#1572,140
2010#933,146
2020#2901,100

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Angelina most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California24,735
New York18,312
Texas11,467
Florida8,029
New Jersey7,125
Pennsylvania5,875
Illinois4,536
Massachusetts4,070
Arizona3,117
Michigan2,597

Questions about Angelina

How popular is the name Angelina?

Angelina ranked #347 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 875 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Angelina most popular?

Angelina peaked in 2005, when 5,813 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Angelina rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Angelina has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-48%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2005, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.